Gas Town Escalation Protocol
> Reference for escalation paths in Gas Town
Overview
Gas Town agents can escalate issues when automated resolution isn't possible. This document covers:
- Severity levels and routing
- Escalation categories for structured communication
- Tiered escalation (Deacon -> Mayor -> Overseer)
- Decision patterns for async resolution
- Integration with gates and patrol lifecycles
Severity Levels
| Level | Priority | Description | Examples |
| CRITICAL | P0 (urgent) | System-threatening, immediate attention | Data corruption, security breach, system down |
| HIGH | P1 (high) | Important blocker, needs human soon | Unresolvable merge conflict, critical bug, ambiguous spec |
| MEDIUM | P2 (normal) | Standard escalation, human at convenience | Design decision needed, unclear requirements |
Escalation Categories
Categories provide structured routing based on the nature of the escalation:
| Category | Description | Default Route |
decision | Multiple valid paths, need choice | Deacon -> Mayor |
help | Need guidance or expertise | Deacon -> Mayor |
blocked | Waiting on unresolvable dependency | Mayor |
failed | Unexpected error, can't proceed | Deacon |
emergency | Security or data integrity issue | Overseer (direct) |
gate_timeout | Gate didn't resolve in time | Deacon |
lifecycle | Worker stuck or needs recycle | Witness |
Escalation Command
Basic Usage (unchanged)
# Basic escalation (default: MEDIUM severity)
gt escalate "Database migration failed"
# Critical escalation - immediate attention
gt escalate -s CRITICAL "Data corruption detected in user table"
# High priority escalation
gt escalate -s HIGH "Merge conflict cannot be resolved automatically"
# With additional details
gt escalate -s MEDIUM "Need clarification on API design" -m "Details..."
Category-Based Escalation
# Decision needed - routes to Deacon first
gt escalate --type decision "Which auth approach?"
# Help request
gt escalate --type help "Need architecture guidance"
# Blocked on dependency
gt escalate --type blocked "Waiting on bd-xyz"
# Failure that can't be recovered
gt escalate --type failed "Tests failing unexpectedly"
# Emergency - direct to Overseer
gt escalate --type emergency "Security vulnerability found"
Tiered Routing
# Explicit routing to specific tier
gt escalate --to deacon "Infra issue"
gt escalate --to mayor "Cross-rig coordination needed"
gt escalate --to overseer "Human judgment required"
# Forward from one tier to next
gt escalate --forward --to mayor "Deacon couldn't resolve"
Structured Decisions
For decisions requiring explicit choices:
gt escalate --type decision \
--question "Which authentication approach?" \
--options "JWT tokens,Session cookies,OAuth2" \
--context "Admin panel needs login" \
--issue bd-xyz
This updates the issue with a structured decision format (see below).
What Happens on Escalation
- Bead created/updated: Escalation bead (tagged
escalation) created or updated - Mail sent: Routed to appropriate tier (Deacon, Mayor, or Overseer)
- Activity logged: Event logged to activity feed
- Issue updated: For decision type, issue gets structured format
Tiered Escalation Flow
Worker encounters issue
|
v
gt escalate --type <category> [--to <tier>]
|
v
[Deacon receives] (default for most categories)
|
+-- Can resolve? --> Updates issue, re-slings work
|
+-- Cannot resolve? --> gt escalate --forward --to mayor
|
v
[Mayor receives]
|
+-- Can resolve? --> Updates issue, re-slings
|
+-- Cannot resolve? --> gt escalate --forward --to overseer
|
v
[Overseer resolves]
Each tier can resolve OR forward. The escalation chain is tracked via comments.
Decision Pattern
When --type decision is used, the issue is updated with structured format:
## Decision Needed
**Question:** Which authentication approach?
| Option | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| A | JWT tokens |
| B | Session cookies |
| C | OAuth2 |
**Context:** Admin panel needs login
**Escalated by:** beads/polecats/obsidian
**Escalated at:** 2026-01-01T15:00:00Z
**To resolve:**
1. Comment with chosen option (e.g., "Decision: A")
2. Reassign to work queue or original worker
The issue becomes the async communication channel. Resolution updates the issue and can trigger re-slinging to the original worker.
Integration Points
Gate Timeouts
When timer gates expire (see bd-7zka.2), Witness escalates:
if gate.Expired() {
exec.Command("gt", "escalate",
"--type", "gate_timeout",
"--severity", "HIGH",
"--issue", gate.BlockedIssueID,
fmt.Sprintf("Gate %s timed out after %s", gate.ID, gate.Timeout)).Run()
}
Witness Patrol
Witness formalizes stuck-polecat detection as escalation:
exec.Command("gt", "escalate",
"--type", "lifecycle",
"--to", "mayor",
"--issue", polecat.CurrentIssue,
fmt.Sprintf("Polecat %s stuck: no progress for %d minutes", polecat.ID, minutes)).Run()
Refinery
On merge failures that can't be auto-resolved:
exec.Command("gt", "escalate",
"--type", "failed",
"--issue", mr.IssueID,
"Merge failed: "+reason).Run()
Polecat Exit with Escalation
When a polecat needs a decision to continue:
# 1. Update issue with decision structure
bd update $ISSUE --notes "$(cat <<EOF
## Decision Needed
**Question:** Which approach for caching?
| Option | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| A | Redis (external dependency) |
| B | In-memory (simpler, no persistence) |
| C | SQLite (local persistence) |
**Context:** API response times are slow, need caching layer.
EOF
)"
# 2. Escalate
gt escalate --type decision --issue $ISSUE "Caching approach needs decision"
# 3. Exit cleanly
gt done --status ESCALATED
Mayor Startup Check
On gt prime, Mayor checks for pending escalations:
## PENDING ESCALATIONS
There are 3 escalation(s) awaiting attention:
CRITICAL: 1
HIGH: 1
MEDIUM: 1
[CRITICAL] Data corruption detected (gt-abc)
[HIGH] Merge conflict in auth module (gt-def)
[MEDIUM] API design clarification needed (gt-ghi)
**Action required:** Review escalations with `bd list --tag=escalation`
Close resolved ones with `bd close <id> --reason "resolution"`
When to Escalate
Agents SHOULD escalate when:
- System errors: Database corruption, disk full, network failures
- Security issues: Unauthorized access attempts, credential exposure
- Unresolvable conflicts: Merge conflicts that can't be auto-resolved
- Ambiguous requirements: Spec is unclear, multiple valid interpretations
- Design decisions: Architectural choices that need human judgment
- Stuck loops: Agent is stuck and can't make progress
- Gate timeouts: Async conditions didn't resolve in expected time
Agents should NOT escalate for:
- Normal workflow: Regular work that can proceed without human input
- Recoverable errors: Transient failures that will auto-retry
- Information queries: Questions that can be answered from context
Viewing Escalations
# List all open escalations
bd list --status=open --tag=escalation
# Filter by category
bd list --tag=escalation --tag=decision
# View specific escalation
bd show <escalation-id>
# Close resolved escalation
bd close <id> --reason "Resolved by fixing X"
Implementation Phases
Phase 1: Extend gt escalate
- Add
--typeflag for categories - Add
--toflag for routing (deacon, mayor, overseer) - Add
--forwardflag for tier forwarding - Backward compatible with existing usage
Phase 2: Decision Pattern
- Add
--question,--options,--contextflags - Auto-update issue with decision structure
- Parse decision from issue comments on resolution
Phase 3: Gate Integration
- Add
gate_timeoutescalation type - Witness checks timer gates, escalates on timeout
- Refinery checks GH gates, escalates on timeout/failure
Phase 4: Patrol Integration
- Formalize Witness stuck-polecat as escalation
- Formalize Refinery merge-failure as escalation
- Unified escalation handling in Mayor
References
- bd-7zka.2: Gate evaluation (uses escalation for timeouts)
- bd-0sgd: Design issue for this extended escalation system